archive/jdk
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/openjdk/jdk.git synced 2025-08-27 14:54:52 +02:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

8036956: remove EnableInvokeDynamic flag

Browse source 
The EnableInvokeDynamic flag and all support code is removed because it is not longer used in JDK 9.

Reviewed-by: kvn, twisti
This commit is contained in:
Tobias Hartmann 2014-04-29 08:08:44 +02:00 • committed by Albert Noll
parent 3fddcd2712
commit 06c26b6f97
35 changed files with 51 additions and 235 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

34
hotspot/src/share/vm/interpreter/bytecodeInterpreter.cpp
View file

@ -507,25 +507,8 @@ BytecodeInterpreter::run(interpreterState istate) {
#ifdef ASSERT
if (istate->_msg != initialize) {
// We have a problem here if we are running with a pre-hsx24 JDK (for example during bootstrap)
// because in that case, EnableInvokeDynamic is true by default but will be later switched off
// if java_lang_invoke_MethodHandle::compute_offsets() detects that the JDK only has the classes
// for the old JSR292 implementation.
// This leads to a situation where 'istate->_stack_limit' always accounts for
// methodOopDesc::extra_stack_entries() because it is computed in
// CppInterpreterGenerator::generate_compute_interpreter_state() which was generated while
// EnableInvokeDynamic was still true. On the other hand, istate->_method->max_stack() doesn't
// account for extra_stack_entries() anymore because at the time when it is called
// EnableInvokeDynamic was already set to false.
// So we have a second version of the assertion which handles the case where EnableInvokeDynamic was
// switched off because of the wrong classes.
if (EnableInvokeDynamic || FLAG_IS_CMDLINE(EnableInvokeDynamic)) {
assert(labs(istate->_stack_base - istate->_stack_limit) == (istate->_method->max_stack() + 1), "bad stack limit");
} else {
const int extra_stack_entries = Method::extra_stack_entries_for_jsr292;
assert(labs(istate->_stack_base - istate->_stack_limit) == (istate->_method->max_stack() + extra_stack_entries
+ 1), "bad stack limit");
}
assert(labs(istate->_stack_base - istate->_stack_limit) == (istate->_method->max_stack() + 1), "bad stack limit");
}
#ifndef SHARK
IA32_ONLY(assert(istate->_stack_limit == istate->_thread->last_Java_sp() + 1, "wrong"));
#endif // !SHARK
@ -2458,15 +2441,6 @@ run:
CASE(_invokedynamic): {
if (!EnableInvokeDynamic) {
// We should not encounter this bytecode if !EnableInvokeDynamic.
// The verifier will stop it. However, if we get past the verifier,
// this will stop the thread in a reasonable way, without crashing the JVM.
CALL_VM(InterpreterRuntime::throw_IncompatibleClassChangeError(THREAD),
handle_exception);
ShouldNotReachHere();
}
u4 index = Bytes::get_native_u4(pc+1);
ConstantPoolCacheEntry* cache = cp->constant_pool()->invokedynamic_cp_cache_entry_at(index);
@ -2501,10 +2475,6 @@ run:
CASE(_invokehandle): {
if (!EnableInvokeDynamic) {
ShouldNotReachHere();
}
u2 index = Bytes::get_native_u2(pc+1);
ConstantPoolCacheEntry* cache = cp->entry_at(index);