mirror of
https://github.com/openjdk/jdk.git
synced 2025-08-28 07:14:30 +02:00
8187443: Forest Consolidation: Move files to unified layout
Reviewed-by: darcy, ihse
This commit is contained in:
parent
270fe13182
commit
3789983e89
56923 changed files with 3 additions and 15727 deletions
232
src/java.base/share/classes/java/security/Permission.java
Normal file
232
src/java.base/share/classes/java/security/Permission.java
Normal file
|
@ -0,0 +1,232 @@
|
|||
/*
|
||||
* Copyright (c) 1997, 2013, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.
|
||||
* DO NOT ALTER OR REMOVE COPYRIGHT NOTICES OR THIS FILE HEADER.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* This code is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
|
||||
* under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 only, as
|
||||
* published by the Free Software Foundation. Oracle designates this
|
||||
* particular file as subject to the "Classpath" exception as provided
|
||||
* by Oracle in the LICENSE file that accompanied this code.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* This code is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT
|
||||
* ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or
|
||||
* FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License
|
||||
* version 2 for more details (a copy is included in the LICENSE file that
|
||||
* accompanied this code).
|
||||
*
|
||||
* You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License version
|
||||
* 2 along with this work; if not, write to the Free Software Foundation,
|
||||
* Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Please contact Oracle, 500 Oracle Parkway, Redwood Shores, CA 94065 USA
|
||||
* or visit www.oracle.com if you need additional information or have any
|
||||
* questions.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
package java.security;
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Abstract class for representing access to a system resource.
|
||||
* All permissions have a name (whose interpretation depends on the subclass),
|
||||
* as well as abstract functions for defining the semantics of the
|
||||
* particular Permission subclass.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* <p>Most Permission objects also include an "actions" list that tells the actions
|
||||
* that are permitted for the object. For example,
|
||||
* for a {@code java.io.FilePermission} object, the permission name is
|
||||
* the pathname of a file (or directory), and the actions list
|
||||
* (such as "read, write") specifies which actions are granted for the
|
||||
* specified file (or for files in the specified directory).
|
||||
* The actions list is optional for Permission objects, such as
|
||||
* {@code java.lang.RuntimePermission},
|
||||
* that don't need such a list; you either have the named permission (such
|
||||
* as "system.exit") or you don't.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* <p>An important method that must be implemented by each subclass is
|
||||
* the {@code implies} method to compare Permissions. Basically,
|
||||
* "permission p1 implies permission p2" means that
|
||||
* if one is granted permission p1, one is naturally granted permission p2.
|
||||
* Thus, this is not an equality test, but rather more of a
|
||||
* subset test.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* <P> Permission objects are similar to String objects in that they
|
||||
* are immutable once they have been created. Subclasses should not
|
||||
* provide methods that can change the state of a permission
|
||||
* once it has been created.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* @see Permissions
|
||||
* @see PermissionCollection
|
||||
*
|
||||
*
|
||||
* @author Marianne Mueller
|
||||
* @author Roland Schemers
|
||||
* @since 1.2
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
public abstract class Permission implements Guard, java.io.Serializable {
|
||||
|
||||
private static final long serialVersionUID = -5636570222231596674L;
|
||||
|
||||
private String name;
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Constructs a permission with the specified name.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* @param name name of the Permission object being created.
|
||||
*
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
public Permission(String name) {
|
||||
this.name = name;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Implements the guard interface for a permission. The
|
||||
* {@code SecurityManager.checkPermission} method is called,
|
||||
* passing this permission object as the permission to check.
|
||||
* Returns silently if access is granted. Otherwise, throws
|
||||
* a SecurityException.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* @param object the object being guarded (currently ignored).
|
||||
*
|
||||
* @throws SecurityException
|
||||
* if a security manager exists and its
|
||||
* {@code checkPermission} method doesn't allow access.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* @see Guard
|
||||
* @see GuardedObject
|
||||
* @see SecurityManager#checkPermission
|
||||
*
|
||||
*/
|
||||
public void checkGuard(Object object) throws SecurityException {
|
||||
SecurityManager sm = System.getSecurityManager();
|
||||
if (sm != null) sm.checkPermission(this);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Checks if the specified permission's actions are "implied by"
|
||||
* this object's actions.
|
||||
* <P>
|
||||
* This must be implemented by subclasses of Permission, as they are the
|
||||
* only ones that can impose semantics on a Permission object.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* <p>The {@code implies} method is used by the AccessController to determine
|
||||
* whether or not a requested permission is implied by another permission that
|
||||
* is known to be valid in the current execution context.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* @param permission the permission to check against.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* @return true if the specified permission is implied by this object,
|
||||
* false if not.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
public abstract boolean implies(Permission permission);
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Checks two Permission objects for equality.
|
||||
* <P>
|
||||
* Do not use the {@code equals} method for making access control
|
||||
* decisions; use the {@code implies} method.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* @param obj the object we are testing for equality with this object.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* @return true if both Permission objects are equivalent.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
public abstract boolean equals(Object obj);
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Returns the hash code value for this Permission object.
|
||||
* <P>
|
||||
* The required {@code hashCode} behavior for Permission Objects is
|
||||
* the following:
|
||||
* <ul>
|
||||
* <li>Whenever it is invoked on the same Permission object more than
|
||||
* once during an execution of a Java application, the
|
||||
* {@code hashCode} method
|
||||
* must consistently return the same integer. This integer need not
|
||||
* remain consistent from one execution of an application to another
|
||||
* execution of the same application.
|
||||
* <li>If two Permission objects are equal according to the
|
||||
* {@code equals}
|
||||
* method, then calling the {@code hashCode} method on each of the
|
||||
* two Permission objects must produce the same integer result.
|
||||
* </ul>
|
||||
*
|
||||
* @return a hash code value for this object.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
public abstract int hashCode();
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Returns the name of this Permission.
|
||||
* For example, in the case of a {@code java.io.FilePermission},
|
||||
* the name will be a pathname.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* @return the name of this Permission.
|
||||
*
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
public final String getName() {
|
||||
return name;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Returns the actions as a String. This is abstract
|
||||
* so subclasses can defer creating a String representation until
|
||||
* one is needed. Subclasses should always return actions in what they
|
||||
* consider to be their
|
||||
* canonical form. For example, two FilePermission objects created via
|
||||
* the following:
|
||||
*
|
||||
* <pre>
|
||||
* perm1 = new FilePermission(p1,"read,write");
|
||||
* perm2 = new FilePermission(p2,"write,read");
|
||||
* </pre>
|
||||
*
|
||||
* both return
|
||||
* "read,write" when the {@code getActions} method is invoked.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* @return the actions of this Permission.
|
||||
*
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
public abstract String getActions();
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Returns an empty PermissionCollection for a given Permission object, or null if
|
||||
* one is not defined. Subclasses of class Permission should
|
||||
* override this if they need to store their permissions in a particular
|
||||
* PermissionCollection object in order to provide the correct semantics
|
||||
* when the {@code PermissionCollection.implies} method is called.
|
||||
* If null is returned,
|
||||
* then the caller of this method is free to store permissions of this
|
||||
* type in any PermissionCollection they choose (one that uses a Hashtable,
|
||||
* one that uses a Vector, etc).
|
||||
*
|
||||
* @return a new PermissionCollection object for this type of Permission, or
|
||||
* null if one is not defined.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
public PermissionCollection newPermissionCollection() {
|
||||
return null;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Returns a string describing this Permission. The convention is to
|
||||
* specify the class name, the permission name, and the actions in
|
||||
* the following format: '("ClassName" "name" "actions")', or
|
||||
* '("ClassName" "name")' if actions list is null or empty.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* @return information about this Permission.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
public String toString() {
|
||||
String actions = getActions();
|
||||
if ((actions == null) || (actions.length() == 0)) { // OPTIONAL
|
||||
return "(\"" + getClass().getName() + "\" \"" + name + "\")";
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
return "(\"" + getClass().getName() + "\" \"" + name +
|
||||
"\" \"" + actions + "\")";
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue