archive/jdk
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/openjdk/jdk.git synced 2025-08-28 07:14:30 +02:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

7001033: assert(gch->gc_cause() == GCCause::_scavenge_alot || !gch->incremental_collection_failed())

Browse source 
7002546: regression on SpecJbb2005 on 7b118 comparing to 7b117 on small heaps

Relaxed assertion checking related to incremental_collection_failed flag to allow for ExplicitGCInvokesConcurrent behaviour where we do not want a failing scavenge to bail to a stop-world collection. Parameterized incremental_collection_will_fail() so we can selectively use, or not use, as appropriate, the statistical prediction at specific use sites. This essentially reverts the scavenge bail-out logic to what it was prior to some recent changes that had inadvertently started using the statistical prediction which can be noisy in the presence of bursty loads. Added some associated verbose non-product debugging messages.

Reviewed-by: johnc, tonyp
This commit is contained in:
Y. Srinivas Ramakrishna 2010-12-07 21:55:53 -08:00
parent 4aaa89ea60
commit 544b475fc5
6 changed files with 54 additions and 23 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

2
hotspot/src/share/vm/gc_implementation/concurrentMarkSweep/concurrentMarkSweepGeneration.inline.hpp
View file

@ -287,7 +287,7 @@ inline bool CMSCollector::should_abort_preclean() const {
// scavenge is done or foreground GC wants to take over collection
return _collectorState == AbortablePreclean &&
(_abort_preclean || _foregroundGCIsActive ||
GenCollectedHeap::heap()->incremental_collection_will_fail());
GenCollectedHeap::heap()->incremental_collection_will_fail(true /* consult_young */));
}
inline size_t CMSCollector::get_eden_used() const {