6663848: assert(i < Max(),"oob") in C2 with -Xcomp

NeverBranchNodes aren't handled properly

Reviewed-by: kvn, sgoldman, rasbold, jrose
This commit is contained in:
Tom Rodriguez 2008-04-24 11:13:03 -07:00
parent 4e3444d0ce
commit 6f63c6e88b
4 changed files with 520 additions and 17 deletions

View file

@ -1981,10 +1981,6 @@ static void final_graph_reshaping_impl( Node *n, Final_Reshape_Counts &fpu ) {
#endif
break;
}
case Op_If:
case Op_CountedLoopEnd:
fpu._tests.push(n); // Collect CFG split points
break;
case Op_AddP: { // Assert sane base pointers
const Node *addp = n->in(AddPNode::Address);
@ -2083,10 +2079,12 @@ static void final_graph_reshaping_impl( Node *n, Final_Reshape_Counts &fpu ) {
default:
assert( !n->is_Call(), "" );
assert( !n->is_Mem(), "" );
if( n->is_If() || n->is_PCTable() )
fpu._tests.push(n); // Collect CFG split points
break;
}
// Collect CFG split points
if (n->is_MultiBranch())
fpu._tests.push(n);
}
//------------------------------final_graph_reshaping_walk---------------------
@ -2165,19 +2163,18 @@ bool Compile::final_graph_reshaping() {
// Check for unreachable (from below) code (i.e., infinite loops).
for( uint i = 0; i < fpu._tests.size(); i++ ) {
Node *n = fpu._tests[i];
assert( n->is_PCTable() || n->is_If(), "either PCTables or IfNodes" );
// Get number of CFG targets; 2 for IfNodes or _size for PCTables.
MultiBranchNode *n = fpu._tests[i]->as_MultiBranch();
// Get number of CFG targets.
// Note that PCTables include exception targets after calls.
uint expected_kids = n->is_PCTable() ? n->as_PCTable()->_size : 2;
if (n->outcnt() != expected_kids) {
uint required_outcnt = n->required_outcnt();
if (n->outcnt() != required_outcnt) {
// Check for a few special cases. Rethrow Nodes never take the
// 'fall-thru' path, so expected kids is 1 less.
if (n->is_PCTable() && n->in(0) && n->in(0)->in(0)) {
if (n->in(0)->in(0)->is_Call()) {
CallNode *call = n->in(0)->in(0)->as_Call();
if (call->entry_point() == OptoRuntime::rethrow_stub()) {
expected_kids--; // Rethrow always has 1 less kid
required_outcnt--; // Rethrow always has 1 less kid
} else if (call->req() > TypeFunc::Parms &&
call->is_CallDynamicJava()) {
// Check for null receiver. In such case, the optimizer has
@ -2187,7 +2184,7 @@ bool Compile::final_graph_reshaping() {
Node *arg0 = call->in(TypeFunc::Parms);
if (arg0->is_Type() &&
arg0->as_Type()->type()->higher_equal(TypePtr::NULL_PTR)) {
expected_kids--;
required_outcnt--;
}
} else if (call->entry_point() == OptoRuntime::new_array_Java() &&
call->req() > TypeFunc::Parms+1 &&
@ -2198,13 +2195,13 @@ bool Compile::final_graph_reshaping() {
Node *arg1 = call->in(TypeFunc::Parms+1);
if (arg1->is_Type() &&
arg1->as_Type()->type()->join(TypeInt::POS)->empty()) {
expected_kids--;
required_outcnt--;
}
}
}
}
// Recheck with a better notion of 'expected_kids'
if (n->outcnt() != expected_kids) {
// Recheck with a better notion of 'required_outcnt'
if (n->outcnt() != required_outcnt) {
record_method_not_compilable("malformed control flow");
return true; // Not all targets reachable!
}