archive/jdk
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/openjdk/jdk.git synced 2025-08-27 06:45:07 +02:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

6684579: SoftReference processing can be made more efficient

Browse source 
For current soft-ref clearing policies, we can decide at marking time if a soft-reference will definitely not be cleared, postponing the decision of whether it will definitely be cleared to the final reference processing phase. This can be especially beneficial in the case of concurrent collectors where the marking is usually concurrent but reference processing is usually not.

Reviewed-by: jmasa
This commit is contained in:
Y. Srinivas Ramakrishna 2008-11-20 16:56:09 -08:00
parent db6bef2c70
commit 7d7cf3f8af
18 changed files with 137 additions and 164 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

16
hotspot/src/share/vm/gc_implementation/parallelScavenge/psMarkSweep.cpp
View file

@ -172,6 +172,7 @@ void PSMarkSweep::invoke_no_policy(bool clear_all_softrefs) {
COMPILER2_PRESENT(DerivedPointerTable::clear());
ref_processor()->enable_discovery();
ref_processor()->snap_policy(clear_all_softrefs);
mark_sweep_phase1(clear_all_softrefs);
@ -517,20 +518,9 @@ void PSMarkSweep::mark_sweep_phase1(bool clear_all_softrefs) {
// Process reference objects found during marking
{
ReferencePolicy *soft_ref_policy;
if (clear_all_softrefs) {
soft_ref_policy = new AlwaysClearPolicy();
} else {
#ifdef COMPILER2
soft_ref_policy = new LRUMaxHeapPolicy();
#else
soft_ref_policy = new LRUCurrentHeapPolicy();
#endif // COMPILER2
}
assert(soft_ref_policy != NULL,"No soft reference policy");
ref_processor()->snap_policy(clear_all_softrefs);
ref_processor()->process_discovered_references(
soft_ref_policy, is_alive_closure(), mark_and_push_closure(),
follow_stack_closure(), NULL);
is_alive_closure(), mark_and_push_closure(), follow_stack_closure(), NULL);
}
// Follow system dictionary roots and unload classes