8348536: Remove remain SIZE_FORMAT usage after JDK-8347990

Reviewed-by: dholmes, kbarrett
This commit is contained in:
SendaoYan 2025-02-25 06:12:39 +00:00
parent a6cc37fdbe
commit e1081cffcb
3 changed files with 7 additions and 7 deletions

View file

@ -143,7 +143,7 @@ static void test_find_nearest_fit_with_tree(const size_t sizes[], size_t request
EXPECT_0(real_size);
}
LOG(SIZE_FORMAT ": %zu.", request_size, real_size);
LOG("%zu: %zu.", request_size, real_size);
}

View file

@ -74,11 +74,11 @@ TEST_VM(metaspace, chunklevel_utils) {
// These tests seem to be really basic, but it is amazing what one can
// break accidentally...
LOG(SIZE_FORMAT, MAX_CHUNK_BYTE_SIZE);
LOG(SIZE_FORMAT, MIN_CHUNK_BYTE_SIZE);
LOG(SIZE_FORMAT, MIN_CHUNK_WORD_SIZE);
LOG(SIZE_FORMAT, MAX_CHUNK_WORD_SIZE);
LOG(SIZE_FORMAT, MAX_CHUNK_BYTE_SIZE);
LOG("%zu", MAX_CHUNK_BYTE_SIZE);
LOG("%zu", MIN_CHUNK_BYTE_SIZE);
LOG("%zu", MIN_CHUNK_WORD_SIZE);
LOG("%zu", MAX_CHUNK_WORD_SIZE);
LOG("%zu", MAX_CHUNK_BYTE_SIZE);
LOG("%u", (unsigned)ROOT_CHUNK_LEVEL);
LOG("%u", (unsigned)HIGHEST_CHUNK_LEVEL);
LOG("%u", (unsigned)LOWEST_CHUNK_LEVEL);

View file

@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ static totals_t get_totals() {
EXPECT_LE(t_real.s, t_expected.s + leeway_s); \
EXPECT_GE(t_real.ovrh, t_expected.ovrh - (leeway_n * sizeof(MallocHeader))); \
EXPECT_LE(t_real.ovrh, t_expected.ovrh + (leeway_n * sizeof(MallocHeader))); \
LOG("Deviation: n=" SSIZE_FORMAT ", s=" SSIZE_FORMAT ", ovrh=" SSIZE_FORMAT, \
LOG("Deviation: n=%zd, s=%zd, ovrh=%zd", \
(ssize_t)t_real.n - (ssize_t)t_expected.n, \
(ssize_t)t_real.s - (ssize_t)t_expected.s, \
(ssize_t)t_real.ovrh - (ssize_t)t_expected.ovrh); \