7199175: JSR 292: C1 needs patching when invokedynamic/invokehandle call site is not linked

Do patching rather bailing out for unlinked call with appendix

Reviewed-by: twisti, kvn
This commit is contained in:
Roland Westrelin 2013-08-21 13:34:45 +02:00
parent dac98bcc0d
commit f188c2bf70
23 changed files with 184 additions and 63 deletions

View file

@ -1667,9 +1667,8 @@ void GraphBuilder::invoke(Bytecodes::Code code) {
const Bytecodes::Code bc_raw = stream()->cur_bc_raw();
assert(declared_signature != NULL, "cannot be null");
// FIXME bail out for now
if (Bytecodes::has_optional_appendix(bc_raw) && !will_link) {
BAILOUT("unlinked call site (FIXME needs patching or recompile support)");
if (!C1PatchInvokeDynamic && Bytecodes::has_optional_appendix(bc_raw) && !will_link) {
BAILOUT("unlinked call site (C1PatchInvokeDynamic is off)");
}
// we have to make sure the argument size (incl. the receiver)
@ -1713,10 +1712,23 @@ void GraphBuilder::invoke(Bytecodes::Code code) {
code = target->is_static() ? Bytecodes::_invokestatic : Bytecodes::_invokespecial;
break;
}
} else {
if (bc_raw == Bytecodes::_invokehandle) {
assert(!will_link, "should come here only for unlinked call");
code = Bytecodes::_invokespecial;
}
}
// Push appendix argument (MethodType, CallSite, etc.), if one.
if (stream()->has_appendix()) {
bool patch_for_appendix = false;
int patching_appendix_arg = 0;
if (C1PatchInvokeDynamic &&
(Bytecodes::has_optional_appendix(bc_raw) && (!will_link || PatchALot))) {
Value arg = append(new Constant(new ObjectConstant(compilation()->env()->unloaded_ciinstance()), copy_state_before()));
apush(arg);
patch_for_appendix = true;
patching_appendix_arg = (will_link && stream()->has_appendix()) ? 0 : 1;
} else if (stream()->has_appendix()) {
ciObject* appendix = stream()->get_appendix();
Value arg = append(new Constant(new ObjectConstant(appendix)));
apush(arg);
@ -1732,7 +1744,8 @@ void GraphBuilder::invoke(Bytecodes::Code code) {
if (UseCHA && DeoptC1 && klass->is_loaded() && target->is_loaded() &&
!(// %%% FIXME: Are both of these relevant?
target->is_method_handle_intrinsic() ||
target->is_compiled_lambda_form())) {
target->is_compiled_lambda_form()) &&
!patch_for_appendix) {
Value receiver = NULL;
ciInstanceKlass* receiver_klass = NULL;
bool type_is_exact = false;
@ -1850,7 +1863,8 @@ void GraphBuilder::invoke(Bytecodes::Code code) {
// check if we could do inlining
if (!PatchALot && Inline && klass->is_loaded() &&
(klass->is_initialized() || klass->is_interface() && target->holder()->is_initialized())
&& target->is_loaded()) {
&& target->is_loaded()
&& !patch_for_appendix) {
// callee is known => check if we have static binding
assert(target->is_loaded(), "callee must be known");
if (code == Bytecodes::_invokestatic ||
@ -1901,7 +1915,7 @@ void GraphBuilder::invoke(Bytecodes::Code code) {
code == Bytecodes::_invokespecial ||
code == Bytecodes::_invokevirtual ||
code == Bytecodes::_invokeinterface;
Values* args = state()->pop_arguments(target->arg_size_no_receiver());
Values* args = state()->pop_arguments(target->arg_size_no_receiver() + patching_appendix_arg);
Value recv = has_receiver ? apop() : NULL;
int vtable_index = Method::invalid_vtable_index;