8051012: Regression in verifier for <init> method call from inside of a branch

Fix stackmap matching for branches.

Reviewed-by: coleenp, lfoltan, acorn
This commit is contained in:
Harold Seigel 2014-08-02 16:28:59 -04:00
parent 7b1571089e
commit f588cd1325
4 changed files with 15 additions and 41 deletions

View file

@ -620,8 +620,6 @@ void ClassVerifier::verify_method(methodHandle m, TRAPS) {
// flow from current instruction to the next
// instruction in sequence
set_furthest_jump(0);
Bytecodes::Code opcode;
while (!bcs.is_last_bytecode()) {
// Check for recursive re-verification before each bytecode.
@ -1780,7 +1778,7 @@ u2 ClassVerifier::verify_stackmap_table(u2 stackmap_index, u2 bci,
// If matched, current_frame will be updated by this method.
bool matches = stackmap_table->match_stackmap(
current_frame, this_offset, stackmap_index,
!no_control_flow, true, &ctx, CHECK_VERIFY_(this, 0));
!no_control_flow, true, false, &ctx, CHECK_VERIFY_(this, 0));
if (!matches) {
// report type error
verify_error(ctx, "Instruction type does not match stack map");
@ -1827,7 +1825,7 @@ void ClassVerifier::verify_exception_handler_targets(u2 bci, bool this_uninit, S
}
ErrorContext ctx;
bool matches = stackmap_table->match_stackmap(
new_frame, handler_pc, true, false, &ctx, CHECK_VERIFY(this));
new_frame, handler_pc, true, false, true, &ctx, CHECK_VERIFY(this));
if (!matches) {
verify_error(ctx, "Stack map does not match the one at "
"exception handler %d", handler_pc);
@ -2238,13 +2236,6 @@ void ClassVerifier::verify_invoke_init(
return;
}
// Make sure that this call is not jumped over.
if (bci < furthest_jump()) {
verify_error(ErrorContext::bad_code(bci),
"Bad <init> method call from inside of a branch");
return;
}
// Make sure that this call is not done from within a TRY block because
// that can result in returning an incomplete object. Simply checking
// (bci >= start_pc) also ensures that this call is not done after a TRY