mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2025-08-15 14:11:42 +02:00
rcu: Fix rcu_read_unlock() deadloop due to IRQ work
During rcu_read_unlock_special(), if this happens during irq_exit(), we can lockup if an IPI is issued. This is because the IPI itself triggers the irq_exit() path causing a recursive lock up. This is precisely what Xiongfeng found when invoking a BPF program on the trace_tick_stop() tracepoint As shown in the trace below. Fix by managing the irq_work state correctly. irq_exit() __irq_exit_rcu() /* in_hardirq() returns false after this */ preempt_count_sub(HARDIRQ_OFFSET) tick_irq_exit() tick_nohz_irq_exit() tick_nohz_stop_sched_tick() trace_tick_stop() /* a bpf prog is hooked on this trace point */ __bpf_trace_tick_stop() bpf_trace_run2() rcu_read_unlock_special() /* will send a IPI to itself */ irq_work_queue_on(&rdp->defer_qs_iw, rdp->cpu); A simple reproducer can also be obtained by doing the following in tick_irq_exit(). It will hang on boot without the patch: static inline void tick_irq_exit(void) { + rcu_read_lock(); + WRITE_ONCE(current->rcu_read_unlock_special.b.need_qs, true); + rcu_read_unlock(); + Reported-by: Xiongfeng Wang <wangxiongfeng2@huawei.com> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/9acd5f9f-6732-7701-6880-4b51190aa070@huawei.com/ Tested-by: Qi Xi <xiqi2@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org> Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org> [neeraj: Apply Frederic's suggested fix for PREEMPT_RT] Signed-off-by: Neeraj Upadhyay (AMD) <neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
d827673d8a
commit
b41642c877
2 changed files with 38 additions and 12 deletions
|
@ -174,6 +174,17 @@ struct rcu_snap_record {
|
|||
unsigned long jiffies; /* Track jiffies value */
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* An IRQ work (deferred_qs_iw) is used by RCU to get the scheduler's attention.
|
||||
* to report quiescent states at the soonest possible time.
|
||||
* The request can be in one of the following states:
|
||||
* - DEFER_QS_IDLE: An IRQ work is yet to be scheduled.
|
||||
* - DEFER_QS_PENDING: An IRQ work was scheduled but either not yet run, or it
|
||||
* ran and we still haven't reported a quiescent state.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
#define DEFER_QS_IDLE 0
|
||||
#define DEFER_QS_PENDING 1
|
||||
|
||||
/* Per-CPU data for read-copy update. */
|
||||
struct rcu_data {
|
||||
/* 1) quiescent-state and grace-period handling : */
|
||||
|
@ -192,7 +203,7 @@ struct rcu_data {
|
|||
/* during and after the last grace */
|
||||
/* period it is aware of. */
|
||||
struct irq_work defer_qs_iw; /* Obtain later scheduler attention. */
|
||||
bool defer_qs_iw_pending; /* Scheduler attention pending? */
|
||||
int defer_qs_iw_pending; /* Scheduler attention pending? */
|
||||
struct work_struct strict_work; /* Schedule readers for strict GPs. */
|
||||
|
||||
/* 2) batch handling */
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -486,13 +486,16 @@ rcu_preempt_deferred_qs_irqrestore(struct task_struct *t, unsigned long flags)
|
|||
struct rcu_node *rnp;
|
||||
union rcu_special special;
|
||||
|
||||
rdp = this_cpu_ptr(&rcu_data);
|
||||
if (rdp->defer_qs_iw_pending == DEFER_QS_PENDING)
|
||||
rdp->defer_qs_iw_pending = DEFER_QS_IDLE;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* If RCU core is waiting for this CPU to exit its critical section,
|
||||
* report the fact that it has exited. Because irqs are disabled,
|
||||
* t->rcu_read_unlock_special cannot change.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
special = t->rcu_read_unlock_special;
|
||||
rdp = this_cpu_ptr(&rcu_data);
|
||||
if (!special.s && !rdp->cpu_no_qs.b.exp) {
|
||||
local_irq_restore(flags);
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
@ -629,7 +632,23 @@ static void rcu_preempt_deferred_qs_handler(struct irq_work *iwp)
|
|||
|
||||
rdp = container_of(iwp, struct rcu_data, defer_qs_iw);
|
||||
local_irq_save(flags);
|
||||
rdp->defer_qs_iw_pending = false;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* If the IRQ work handler happens to run in the middle of RCU read-side
|
||||
* critical section, it could be ineffective in getting the scheduler's
|
||||
* attention to report a deferred quiescent state (the whole point of the
|
||||
* IRQ work). For this reason, requeue the IRQ work.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Basically, we want to avoid following situation:
|
||||
* 1. rcu_read_unlock() queues IRQ work (state -> DEFER_QS_PENDING)
|
||||
* 2. CPU enters new rcu_read_lock()
|
||||
* 3. IRQ work runs but cannot report QS due to rcu_preempt_depth() > 0
|
||||
* 4. rcu_read_unlock() does not re-queue work (state still PENDING)
|
||||
* 5. Deferred QS reporting does not happen.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (rcu_preempt_depth() > 0)
|
||||
WRITE_ONCE(rdp->defer_qs_iw_pending, DEFER_QS_IDLE);
|
||||
|
||||
local_irq_restore(flags);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -676,17 +695,13 @@ static void rcu_read_unlock_special(struct task_struct *t)
|
|||
set_tsk_need_resched(current);
|
||||
set_preempt_need_resched();
|
||||
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IRQ_WORK) && irqs_were_disabled &&
|
||||
expboost && !rdp->defer_qs_iw_pending && cpu_online(rdp->cpu)) {
|
||||
expboost && rdp->defer_qs_iw_pending != DEFER_QS_PENDING &&
|
||||
cpu_online(rdp->cpu)) {
|
||||
// Get scheduler to re-evaluate and call hooks.
|
||||
// If !IRQ_WORK, FQS scan will eventually IPI.
|
||||
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RCU_STRICT_GRACE_PERIOD) &&
|
||||
IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT))
|
||||
rdp->defer_qs_iw = IRQ_WORK_INIT_HARD(
|
||||
rcu_preempt_deferred_qs_handler);
|
||||
else
|
||||
init_irq_work(&rdp->defer_qs_iw,
|
||||
rcu_preempt_deferred_qs_handler);
|
||||
rdp->defer_qs_iw_pending = true;
|
||||
rdp->defer_qs_iw =
|
||||
IRQ_WORK_INIT_HARD(rcu_preempt_deferred_qs_handler);
|
||||
rdp->defer_qs_iw_pending = DEFER_QS_PENDING;
|
||||
irq_work_queue_on(&rdp->defer_qs_iw, rdp->cpu);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue