This patch changes processing a little and causes some crafted tags to not be parsed and generate a warning.
This is a slight BC break from earlier versions, since it will no longer return the tags of that it was mismatching (see bug68799.phpt), namely the "WINXP" section and the "Author" tag is no longer returned due to this. Although this BC break is merely only for crafted tags, this can also have some real life effects on pictures re-saved from editors that can cause bad exif data writes, so lets keep it here.
Sony is a little more interesting, as it is have a large range of tags it support in different models. For now I have added all the tags found within the Exif.Sony1 namespace.
Before this patch, exif_process_IFD_in_MAKERNOTE() would return false, then causing the rest of the EXIF parsing to be interrupted. This is a regression from earlier which was most likely a part of a security fix for MAKERNOTE.
The new behavior is to instead of stopping to parse, to continue so we can still fetch data like thumbnail and GPS, thrus allowing yet unsupported formats to parse. If EXIF's debugging mode is enabled, a notice will display in case we do not match against a valid MAKERNOTE signature.
This should temporarily fix bug #72682 (exif_read_data() fails to read all data for some images) until I get around to debug it further.
Before this patch, exif_process_IFD_in_MAKERNOTE() would return false, then causing the rest of the EXIF parsing to be interrupted. This is a regression from earlier which was most likely a part of a security fix for MAKERNOTE.
The new behavior is to instead of stopping to parse, to continue so we can still fetch data like thumbnail and GPS, thrus allowing yet unsupported formats to parse. If EXIF's debugging mode is enabled, a notice will display in case we do not match against a valid MAKERNOTE signature.
This should temporarily fix bug #72682 (exif_read_data() fails to read all data for some images) until I get around to debug it further.
(cherry picked from commit aabcb5481d)
Before this patch, exif_process_IFD_in_MAKERNOTE() would return false, then causing the rest of the EXIF parsing to be interrupted. This is a regression from earlier which was most likely a part of a security fix for MAKERNOTE.
The new behavior is to instead of stopping to parse, to continue so we can still fetch data like thumbnail and GPS, thrus allowing yet unsupported formats to parse. If EXIF's debugging mode is enabled, a notice will display in case we do not match against a valid MAKERNOTE signature.
This should temporarily fix bug #72682 (exif_read_data() fails to read all data for some images) until I get around to debug it further.
There are two factors for this bug fix:
- First of all, the maximum nesting level has been increased to 150 (previously 100), I'm not sure how much an impact this will have, but increasing this value also seems to resolve PHP bug #66443 (Corrupt EXIF header: maximum directory nesting level reached for some cameras.)
- Second, this adds support for most common Panasonic EXIF tags, again this list is based off the Exiv2 website
Note about Panasonic's format:
From what I could find, then the offset was always 12 bytes for such, the signature always had the 'P' capitalized, and the rest lower cased, followed by 3 NULL bytes
@Remi, can you review this? I'm gonna look into Sony (which is huge btw!) and your patch next
It seems like there is no maker data for "Samsung", this causes the IDF tag parsing to fail, and it bails early on, despite there still is valid remaining data in image, such as the thumbnail data as reported in the bug.
I used the Exiv2 website as a reference guide for tags that's specific to Samsung's EXIF data, which should also mean that we will be able to name some of those tags more specifically now.
I have chosen again not to commit this to other branches, simply because I'm not 100% sure on the byte order and offsets for Samsung, I did some research and it seems like there are many variants, but this (very copy/pasted), entry works for this particular image and does not break any other tests. This does add a new feature I suppose, while also fixing a bug, but I will leave it to the other branch RMs to decide on how far down they will want to merge this.
