mirror of
https://github.com/ruby/ruby.git
synced 2025-08-15 13:39:04 +02:00
Elide Generator::State allocation until a to_json
method has to be called
Fix: https://github.com/ruby/json/issues/655 For very small documents, the biggest performance gap with alternatives is that the API impose that we allocate the `State` object. In a real world app this doesn't make much of a difference, but when running in a micro-benchmark this doubles the allocations, causing twice the amount of GC runs, making us look bad. However, unless we have to call a `to_json` method, the `State` object isn't visible, so with some refactoring, we can elude that allocation entirely. Instead we allocate the State internal struct on the stack, and if we need to call a `to_json` method, we allocate the `State` and spill the struct on the heap. As a result, `JSON.generate` is now as fast as re-using a `State` instance, as long as only primitives are generated. Before: ``` == Encoding small mixed (34 bytes) ruby 3.3.4 (2024-07-09 revisionbe1089c8ec
) +YJIT [arm64-darwin23] Warming up -------------------------------------- json (reuse) 598.654k i/100ms json 400.542k i/100ms oj 533.353k i/100ms Calculating ------------------------------------- json (reuse) 6.371M (± 8.6%) i/s (156.96 ns/i) - 31.729M in 5.059195s json 4.120M (± 6.6%) i/s (242.72 ns/i) - 20.828M in 5.090549s oj 5.622M (± 6.4%) i/s (177.86 ns/i) - 28.268M in 5.061473s Comparison: json (reuse): 6371126.6 i/s oj: 5622452.0 i/s - same-ish: difference falls within error json: 4119991.1 i/s - 1.55x slower == Encoding small nested array (121 bytes) ruby 3.3.4 (2024-07-09 revisionbe1089c8ec
) +YJIT [arm64-darwin23] Warming up -------------------------------------- json (reuse) 248.125k i/100ms json 215.255k i/100ms oj 217.531k i/100ms Calculating ------------------------------------- json (reuse) 2.628M (± 6.1%) i/s (380.55 ns/i) - 13.151M in 5.030281s json 2.185M (± 6.7%) i/s (457.74 ns/i) - 10.978M in 5.057655s oj 2.217M (± 6.7%) i/s (451.10 ns/i) - 11.094M in 5.044844s Comparison: json (reuse): 2627799.4 i/s oj: 2216824.8 i/s - 1.19x slower json: 2184669.5 i/s - 1.20x slower == Encoding small hash (65 bytes) ruby 3.3.4 (2024-07-09 revisionbe1089c8ec
) +YJIT [arm64-darwin23] Warming up -------------------------------------- json (reuse) 641.334k i/100ms json 322.745k i/100ms oj 642.450k i/100ms Calculating ------------------------------------- json (reuse) 7.133M (± 6.5%) i/s (140.19 ns/i) - 35.915M in 5.068201s json 4.615M (± 7.0%) i/s (216.70 ns/i) - 22.915M in 5.003718s oj 6.912M (± 6.4%) i/s (144.68 ns/i) - 34.692M in 5.047690s Comparison: json (reuse): 7133123.3 i/s oj: 6911977.1 i/s - same-ish: difference falls within error json: 4614696.6 i/s - 1.55x slower ``` After: ``` == Encoding small mixed (34 bytes) ruby 3.3.4 (2024-07-09 revisionbe1089c8ec
) +YJIT [arm64-darwin23] Warming up -------------------------------------- json (reuse) 572.751k i/100ms json 457.741k i/100ms oj 512.247k i/100ms Calculating ------------------------------------- json (reuse) 6.324M (± 6.9%) i/s (158.12 ns/i) - 31.501M in 5.023093s json 6.263M (± 6.9%) i/s (159.66 ns/i) - 31.126M in 5.017086s oj 5.569M (± 6.6%) i/s (179.56 ns/i) - 27.661M in 5.003739s Comparison: json (reuse): 6324183.5 i/s json: 6263204.9 i/s - same-ish: difference falls within error oj: 5569049.2 i/s - same-ish: difference falls within error == Encoding small nested array (121 bytes) ruby 3.3.4 (2024-07-09 revisionbe1089c8ec
) +YJIT [arm64-darwin23] Warming up -------------------------------------- json (reuse) 258.505k i/100ms json 242.335k i/100ms oj 220.678k i/100ms Calculating ------------------------------------- json (reuse) 2.589M (± 9.6%) i/s (386.17 ns/i) - 12.925M in 5.071853s json 2.594M (± 6.6%) i/s (385.46 ns/i) - 13.086M in 5.083035s oj 2.250M (± 2.3%) i/s (444.43 ns/i) - 11.255M in 5.004707s Comparison: json (reuse): 2589499.6 i/s json: 2594321.0 i/s - same-ish: difference falls within error oj: 2250064.0 i/s - 1.15x slower == Encoding small hash (65 bytes) ruby 3.3.4 (2024-07-09 revisionbe1089c8ec
) +YJIT [arm64-darwin23] Warming up -------------------------------------- json (reuse) 656.373k i/100ms json 644.135k i/100ms oj 650.283k i/100ms Calculating ------------------------------------- json (reuse) 7.202M (± 7.1%) i/s (138.84 ns/i) - 36.101M in 5.051438s json 7.278M (± 1.7%) i/s (137.40 ns/i) - 36.716M in 5.046300s oj 7.036M (± 1.7%) i/s (142.12 ns/i) - 35.766M in 5.084729s Comparison: json (reuse): 7202447.9 i/s json: 7277883.0 i/s - same-ish: difference falls within error oj: 7036115.2 i/s - same-ish: difference falls within error ```
This commit is contained in:
parent
88b411464d
commit
cc2e67a138
5 changed files with 141 additions and 76 deletions
|
@ -60,6 +60,7 @@ end
|
|||
# The performance difference is mostly more time spent in GC because of this extra pressure.
|
||||
# If we re-use the same `JSON::State` instance, we're faster than Oj on the array benchmark, and much closer
|
||||
# on the Hash one.
|
||||
benchmark_encoding "small mixed", [1, "string", { a: 1, b: 2 }, [3, 4, 5]]
|
||||
benchmark_encoding "small nested array", [[1,2,3,4,5]]*10
|
||||
benchmark_encoding "small hash", { "username" => "jhawthorn", "id" => 123, "event" => "wrote json serializer" }
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue