Since #6006, we no longer avoid executing GC on mjit_worker.c and thus
there's no need to carefully change how we write code whether you're in
mjit.c or mjit_worker.c anymore.
Use ISEQ_BODY macro to get the rb_iseq_constant_body of the ISeq. Using
this macro will make it easier for us to change the allocation strategy
of rb_iseq_constant_body when using Variable Width Allocation.
by a race condition by multiple Ractors.
Atmically incrementing body->total_calls may have its own cost, so for
now we intentionally leave the unreliable total_calls. So we allow an
ISeq to be never pushed when you use multiple Ractors. However, if you
enqueue a single ccan node twice, get_from_list loops infinitely. Thus
this patch takes care of such a situation.
This is a follow-up of 86c262541a.
CRITICAL_SECTION_START/FINISH are not needed when it's called from an
MJIT worker.
Also, ZALLOC needs to be calloc because ZALLOC may trigger GC, which an
MJIT worker must not do.
This fixes SEGVs like 2715166621.
When mjit_recompile is called when mjit_compile is compiling the exact
same iseq (and after it called mjit_capture_cc_entries), iseq->body->jit_unit
is re-created and its cc_entries becomes NULL. Then, when it tries to
lookup cc_entries through iseq->body->jit_unit, it fails.
Compiling everything seems to contributed to improving the final
performance in general. MJIT's compilation is slow anyway, especially
when you need to wait for JIT compaction.
This might make sense for short-time benchmarks like Optcarrot with
default parameters, but it didn't give benefits in my local environment.
constant cache `IC` is accessed by non-atomic manner and there are
thread-safety issues, so Ruby 3.0 disables to use const cache on
non-main ractors.
This patch enables it by introducing `imemo_constcache` and allocates
it by every re-fill of const cache like `imemo_callcache`.
[Bug #17510]
Now `IC` only has one entry `IC::entry` and it points to
`iseq_inline_constant_cache_entry`, managed by T_IMEMO object.
`IC` is atomic data structure so `rb_mjit_before_vm_ic_update()` and
`rb_mjit_after_vm_ic_update()` is not needed.
to avoid SEGV on mjit_recompile and compact_all_jit_code.
For some reason, ISeqs on stack are sometimes GC-ed (why?) and therefore
it may run mjit_recompile on a GC-ed ISeq, which I expected d07183ec85
to fix but apparently it may refer to random things if already GC-ed.
Marking active_units would workaround the situation.
http://ci.rvm.jp/results/trunk-mjit-wait@phosphorus-docker/3292740
Also, while compact_all_jit_code was executed, we saw some SEGVs where
CCs seemed to be already GC-ed, meaning their owner ISeq was not marked
properly. Even if units are still in active_units, it's not guaranteed
that their ISeqs are in use. So in this case we need to mark active_units
for a legitimate reason.
http://ci.rvm.jp/results/trunk-mjit-wait@phosphorus-docker/3293277http://ci.rvm.jp/results/trunk-mjit-wait@phosphorus-docker/3293090
The original motivation of this marking was https://github.com/k0kubun/yarv-mjit/issues/20.
As wanabe said, there are multiple options to mitigate the issue, and
Eric Wong introduced another fix at 143776f6fe by checking unit->iseq
inside the lock.
Therefore this particular condition has been covered in two ways, and
the script given by wanabe no longer crashes without mjit_mark().
Because d80226e7bd often reduces the number of unloaded units, it
increases the number of unload_units calls, which are heavy.
To mitigate that, this throttles unload_units per `max_cache_size / 10`.
Also hoping to fix
36552382/job/kjmjgw9cjyf2ksd7
to avoid "Too many JIT code, but skipped unloading units for JIT compaction".
Now we can forget the `in_compact` locking.
Moving some functions from mjit.c to mjit_worker.c because mjit_worker.c
should have functions executed in the JIT worker.
This has been a TODO since 79df14c04b. While adcf0316d1 covered the
root_fiber of the initial thread, it didn't cover root_fibers of other
threads. Now it's hooked properly in rb_threadptr_root_fiber_setup.
With regards to "XXX: Is this mjit_cont `mjit_cont_free`d?", when
rb_threadptr_root_fiber_release is called, although I'm not sure when
th->root_fiber is truthy, fiber_free seems to call cont_free and
mjit_cont_free. So mjit_conts of root_fibers seem to be freed properly.
