If the `ref` option is a specific commit SHA, we can check to see if
it's already fetched locally. If it is, then we don't need to re-fetch
it from the remote.
The `ref` option might not be a commit SHA, so we're using the `#commit`
method which returns the full SHA if it's a commit ref, or the locked
revision, or nil.
This is a small improvement that will make `bundle update` slightly
faster in cases for git-sourced gems pinned to a specific commit.
f434c2e66c
The `file://` protocol does not really work with relative paths and it's
not necessary anyways. So restore support for that by not using
`file://`.
16a68998ce
We have some flags that limit running git commit commands under certain
situations, for example, when running under `--local`. However, those
should only affect remote git operations, not local read-only operations
like `git --version`, or `git rev-parse --abbrev-ref HEAD`.
This commit refactors things to achieve that.
By doing this, the `#to_s` representation of a source is more
consistent, since we don't get any errors when reading the checked out
branch, and we avoid some flip-flop lockfile issues.
4a529fce81
Since Bundler 2.4, we will try to checkout any branch specified in the
Gemfile, while until Bundler 2.3 we would directly checkout the locked
revision.
This should not make any difference in most situations, but in some edge
cases, like if the branch specified in the `Gemfile` has been renamed,
but the locked revision still exist, it causes an error now while before
it would update the lockfile without issues.
I debated which behavior was best, since I was not sure. But my
conclusion is that if the situation does not require expiring the
lockfile source in favor of the Gemfile source, we should use the locked
revision directly and proceed happily. So I restored Bundler 2.3
behavior.
I think this is consistent with how yanked gems are handled, for example.
Of course, if explicitly updating the git source itself, or all gems, we
will still get any errors like missing branches related to the git source.
* bin/*, lib/bundler/*, lib/bundler.rb, spec/bundler, man/*:
Merge from latest stable branch of bundler/bundler repository and
added workaround patches. I will backport them into upstream.
* common.mk, defs/gmake.mk: Added `test-bundler` task for test suite
of bundler.
* tool/sync_default_gems.rb: Added sync task for bundler.
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://ci.ruby-lang.org/ruby/trunk@65509 b2dd03c8-39d4-4d8f-98ff-823fe69b080e
I faced a big issue about Bundler with ruby core.
I have no time to resolve it issue before 2.5 final release.
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://ci.ruby-lang.org/ruby/trunk@61416 b2dd03c8-39d4-4d8f-98ff-823fe69b080e
rubygems 2.7.x depends bundler-1.15.x. This is preparation for
rubygems and bundler migration.
* lib/bundler.rb, lib/bundler/*: files of bundler-1.15.4
* spec/bundler/*: rspec examples of bundler-1.15.4. I applied patches.
* https://github.com/bundler/bundler/pull/6007
* Exclude not working examples on ruby repository.
* Fake ruby interpriter instead of installed ruby.
* Makefile.in: Added test task named `test-bundler`. This task is only
working macOS/linux yet. I'm going to support Windows environment later.
* tool/sync_default_gems.rb: Added sync task for bundler.
[Feature #12733][ruby-core:77172]
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://ci.ruby-lang.org/ruby/trunk@59779 b2dd03c8-39d4-4d8f-98ff-823fe69b080e
