The `openssl` require when openssl not present was having the
side-effect the our custom require fallbacks would end up loading `Gem::Specification.stubs`.
Co-authored-by: Alyssa Ross <hi@alyssa.is>
22c4ded4ad
GNU make in MSys is localized to use UTF-8 while Ruby's filesystem
encoding is set to OEM CodePage (e.g., CP932 in Japanese Edition),
the read output from the make has broken encoding and results in
"invalid byte sequence" errors. As `DESTDIR` is set to a US-ASCII
7bit clean string, matching as binary encoding should have no
problems.
96a5e7523b
It seems like the most common case since it requires no tricks on our
CI environment.
Co-authored-by: MSP-Greg <MSP-Greg@users.noreply.github.com>
751c475574
It's very unlikely to hit this case, but it is possible, as
Thread::Backtrace::Location#path can return nil if the location is
a cfunc with no previous iseq. See location_path in vm_backtrace.c
in Ruby.
511935645a
* See https://github.com/oracle/truffleruby/issues/2046
* `<internal:` is a common prefix also used by core Ruby files in CRuby.
* test_no_kernel_require_in_*warn_with_uplevel already test this.
* Unfortunately just skipping `<internal:` in the Ruby implementation
is not enough, because RubyGems' #warn would not skip the
`<internal:` require (TruffleRuby defines #require in Ruby),
and the Ruby implementation's #warn would not skip
RubyGems's #require. The #caller_locations(0) look like this:
warnee.rb:1:in `<top (required)>' # where #warn is called
<internal:core> core/kernel.rb:234:in `gem_original_require' # not skipped by RubyGems' warn, skipped by the Ruby impl
rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb:54:in `require' # not skipped by the Ruby impl's warn, what would be shown without this fix
warn.rb:1:in `<main>' # what would be correct
warn.rb is
require "warnee"
warnee.rb is
puts caller_locations(0), nil
warn "oops", uplevel: 1
7c838f7419
It was added 10 years ago on a "146 additions, 170 deletions" commit
named "Deprecation removals and minor cleanup." that didn't explain much
other than that.
This TODO doesn't necessarily apply nowadays. I don't see how anyways.
TODO notes, if useful at all, should include a clear explanation of what
should be done either via the note itself or the commit message. This
note doens't meet any of these.
So I want to remove it because it distracts me every time I go through
it.
58d81e8a32
The previous commit introduces the Gem::Security.create_digest method, allowing to:
- decouple algorithm choice from implementation (OpenSSL or Ruby built-in)
- untangle the SHA512 fallback for TarWriter from the generic hashing digest choice (undoing commit 9471f8ed2bdc12248d2619bbbce6e53cd6c16cb6)
1bc03231e4
the Gem module's auto-loads will handle loading these as needed,
this started as a redundancy found in *rubygems.rb* which had:
`autoload :Specification, 'rubygems/specification'` as well as
`require 'rubygems/specification'`
43ceae7ac0
"requiring version.rb" strategy has some issues.
- cannot work when cross-compiling
- often introduces wrong namespace
- must know the superclasses
- costs at each runtime than at build-time
etc.
Both clone & dup returns a new object when executed
on the documentation looks like they are returning the
same object cloned or dup'ed which is true for method
as extend, but not for the above mentioned.
