This is just a suggestion, but since recent versions of Ruby have shipped with a `binding.irb` that provides almost all of the features that `pry` pioneered, it may be time to remove this suggestion in the name of simplicity and not confusing newer developers who aren't familiar with what to use.
(https://github.com/ruby/reline/pull/509)
* Add key bindings for PgUp, PgDn
* Match behavior of readline 8.2
In the latest readline (8.2), page-up and page-down are bound to
history-search-backward and history-search-forward by default.
We would like reline to have the same default behavior.
Since Bundler 2.4, we will try to checkout any branch specified in the
Gemfile, while until Bundler 2.3 we would directly checkout the locked
revision.
This should not make any difference in most situations, but in some edge
cases, like if the branch specified in the `Gemfile` has been renamed,
but the locked revision still exist, it causes an error now while before
it would update the lockfile without issues.
I debated which behavior was best, since I was not sure. But my
conclusion is that if the situation does not require expiring the
lockfile source in favor of the Gemfile source, we should use the locked
revision directly and proceed happily. So I restored Bundler 2.3
behavior.
I think this is consistent with how yanked gems are handled, for example.
Of course, if explicitly updating the git source itself, or all gems, we
will still get any errors like missing branches related to the git source.
This was working fine for direct dependencies using
`force_ruby_platform` explicitly through Gemfile, but not for indirect
dependencies. In general, indirect dependencies do not have this
property set, but in truffleruby this is different and the default value
is to have it set.
This should be a very rare edge case, however, it does happen when using
a .dev version of Bundler because in that case, that's the only version
that the resolver considers, and it should not be ignored.
We could've special cased this specifically for Bundler, but I think it
does make sense for every gem.
