Since Bundler 2.4, we will try to checkout any branch specified in the
Gemfile, while until Bundler 2.3 we would directly checkout the locked
revision.
This should not make any difference in most situations, but in some edge
cases, like if the branch specified in the `Gemfile` has been renamed,
but the locked revision still exist, it causes an error now while before
it would update the lockfile without issues.
I debated which behavior was best, since I was not sure. But my
conclusion is that if the situation does not require expiring the
lockfile source in favor of the Gemfile source, we should use the locked
revision directly and proceed happily. So I restored Bundler 2.3
behavior.
I think this is consistent with how yanked gems are handled, for example.
Of course, if explicitly updating the git source itself, or all gems, we
will still get any errors like missing branches related to the git source.
This was working fine for direct dependencies using
`force_ruby_platform` explicitly through Gemfile, but not for indirect
dependencies. In general, indirect dependencies do not have this
property set, but in truffleruby this is different and the default value
is to have it set.
This should be a very rare edge case, however, it does happen when using
a .dev version of Bundler because in that case, that's the only version
that the resolver considers, and it should not be ignored.
We could've special cased this specifically for Bundler, but I think it
does make sense for every gem.
If the original `BUNDLE_GEMFILE` is different from the default, then the
suggestion wouldn't work as is.
Before:
```
$ util/rubocop
Could not find rubocop-1.30.1 in locally installed gems
Run `bundle install` to install missing gems.
$ rubygems git:(better-cmd-suggestion) ✗ bundle install
Could not locate Gemfile
```
After:
```
$ util/rubocop
Could not find rubocop-1.30.1 in locally installed gems
Run `bundle install --gemfile /path/to/rubygems/bundler/tool/bundler/lint_gems.rb` to install missing gems.
$ bundle install --gemfile /path/to/rubygems/bundler/tool/bundler/lint_gems.rb
Fetching gem metadata from https://rubygems.org/.........
Using ast 2.4.2
Using bundler 2.4.7
Using parser 3.1.2.0
Using rainbow 3.1.1
Using parallel 1.22.1
Using regexp_parser 2.5.0
Using rubocop-ast 1.18.0
Using rexml 3.2.5
Using ruby-progressbar 1.11.0
Using unicode-display_width 2.1.0
Fetching rubocop 1.30.1
Installing rubocop 1.30.1
Using rubocop-performance 1.14.2
Bundle complete! 2 Gemfile dependencies, 12 gems now installed.
Use `bundle info [gemname]` to see where a bundled gem is installed.
$ util/rubocop
Inspecting 345 files
.........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
345 files inspected, no offenses detected
```
bf1320d805
* Replaces the wording of "is forbidden" with "cannot be used"
* Fixes the method signature of VersionRange::Empty#eql?
8c6b3f130b
Co-authored-by: Daniel Colson <danieljamescolson@gmail.com>
The previous code loads bundler's gemspec which does not include the generated
gemspec file, and thus the test was passing where it should indeed fail.
With this change, the test properly fails now.
2098ea0d75
Prior to this commit `bundle binstubs --standalone --all` would output a
warning about not being able to generate a standalone binstub for
bundler.
This warning predates the `--all` option, and I don't think it makes
sense in this context. The warning makes good sense when explicitly
trying to generate a bundler standalone binstub with `bundle binstubs
bundler --standalone`, since that command won't do what the user might
have expected. But `--all` is not specifically asking for bundler, and
having it report each time that the bundler binstubs could not be
generated does not seem particularly helpful. The only way to make that
warning go away would be to stop using `--standalone --all`.
This commit skips the warning when running with the `--all` option.
e6a72e19eb
bundle lock --update can do everything that bundle update can do, but
it doesn't actually install gems. This is especially useful for
generating a lockfile on a machine that doesn't have the libraries
available to be able to build native extensions.
But, there was no parallel for bundle update --bundler. So let's add
one.
7fc00bd2a5
This allows the file to be created without copying permissions
from Bundler's installation source. The previous behaviour was
noticed after installing Ruby through brew, and using bundle
init, which yielded a read-only Gemfile.
839a06851d
When `--conservative` is passed, explicit unlocks are set for top level
gems via `@unlock[:gems]`, so that only those particular gems are
allowed to be updated.
When we compute the "base resolve" from the lockfile (the set of gems
whose versions should be kept pinned by the resolver), we always exclude
gems explicitly unlocked through `@unlock[:gems]` from it. This is done
by the `converge_specs` method.
However, the `converge_specs` method is also used for figuring out
additional lower bound requirements from the lockfile. But in this case,
even if gems are explicitly unlock in `@unlock[:gems]`, we still want to
add the additional requirement, so that gems are not downgraded by the
resolver.
So the solution is to move the line filtering out gems in
`@unlock[:gems]` from the `converged_specs` method out of that method,
so that it only applies for computing the "base resolve", but not the
addtional lower bound requirements.
405119bd7b
It should be an alias of `--filter-strict`.
`--update-strict` is essentially a dummy option with no special behavior
associated and should be deprecated.
ec1e5d83c8
When testing under the ruby/ruby setup, mkmf.rb needs to the `$extout`
global variable set properly.
This is because, in this particular case, the `ruby.h` header needed to
compile extensions is constructed from
`$(extout)/include($arch)/ruby/config.h` but `$extout` is not set by
default.
I tried to fix this in mkmf.rb itself but I couldn't figure it. But
setting it externally to workaround the issue fixes the specs, so I'll
start with that. Also setting it externally causes issues when running
specs upstream against Ruby 2.3 (I guess because of some difference with
Ruby 2.3 mkmf.rb implementation). So I'm avoiding doing it on Ruby 2.3 to
woraround that.
d782984585
